What the reviews say
The scraper is fast and well‑structured, but it fails on filtering, accuracy, completeness, reliability, and offers unclear value for its price.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it supports | 0 praised · 6 complained | 6 | lacks filters for date, industry, seniorityfails to find or scrape many company jobs“It's really nice, But I would like to scrape all the jobs that are available for 1 company. And it only gets me 4 results, think because you need to be logged in.” — 4/5 |
| Does it return everything | 0 praised · 6 complained | 6 | omits job identifiers, company links, logosreturns very small, limited result sets“Actor is good, but only scraping easy apply ones. It would be more better if it scrapes other jobs as well with a link to company portal to apply. :)” — 3/5 |
| Is the data right | 0 praised · 5 complained | 5 | poor relevance; returns incorrect or unrelated titlesmislabels easy‑apply and includes recruiter spam“The scraper is returning a lot of records that do not match my search criteria. For example, I enter CTO and get back a long list of other titles. Please fix.” — 3/5 |
| What it costs | 0 praised · 4 complained | 4 | no free tier; unclear value for cost“While the computing is fast, the output frequently lacks relevance to the input query. Greater accuracy is needed for the service to be worth $29 per month.” — 3/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | cannot filter by easy‑apply or salary“Very useful - thanks! I would give five stars if it included a filter for salary range.” — 4/5 |
| Does it run | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | unstable behavior: inputs overwritten; sometimes fails“Doesn´t work. I try to found Oracle but cannot find;” — 2/5 |
| Setup and docs | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | well-structured interface and fast performanceinput parameters need improvement“Highly recommend it. Well structured and fast enough. Thank you” — 5/5 |
| How fast | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | fast computation and responsive performance |
Does it return everything
0 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 6Is the data right
0 ↑ · 5 ↓ of 5What it costs
0 ↑ · 4 ↓ of 4History
30 readings since 2026-08-27Alternatives on LinkedIn
The actors either side of #13 of 1,383, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | B | RES$0.40 /1kgood price | 4,28324.6K total | 98.7% | 4.7 | 17m | aging | ||
| 9 | B | RES$0.70 /1kgood price | 4,14249.9K total | 97.5% | 4.1 | 20m | aging | ||
| 10 | B | RES$5.00 /1kfair price | 3,73519.4K total | 99.8% | 4.7 | 22m | aging | ||
| 11 | A | EVT$2.00 /1k postgood price | 3,52012.1K total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 15m | fresh | ||
| 12 | B | RES$5.00 /1kfair price | 2,50222.9K total | 98.8% | 4.8 | 21m | aging | ||
| 13 | B | RES$1.50 /1kfair price | 2,42039.0K total | 99.1% | 4.3 | 3.6y | fresh | This | |
| 14 | C | EVT$2.00 /1k lead-fetchedgood price | 2,19047.7K total | 98.6% | 3.5 | 12m | fresh | ||
| 15 | C | RES$5.00 /1kfair price | 1,82314.9K total | 99.9% | 2.9 | 15m | fresh | ||
| 16 | A | EVT$2.00 /1k post-commentgood price | 1,7197,806 total | 100.0% | 4.8 | 16m | fresh | ||
| 17 | B | EVT$2.00 /1k short-companygood price | 1,6467,913 total | 100.0% | 4.4 | 10m | fresh | ||
| 18 | B | EVT$4.00 /1k search-pagesteep price | 1,6027,851 total | 87.0% | 4.5 | 14m | fresh |