streamers
Fast YouTube Channel Scraper
YouTubeDoes it return everything
0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2no video transcriptions or metadata counts“I like it, it got everything i needed from the channel, but i was expecting the transcription of the videos. Either way, i like the tool man.” — 5/5
What the reviews say
Fast, easy to use and reliable for integrations with generally accurate data, but it misses transcriptions and engagement counts, has poor channel coverage and filters, unresponsive support, and low-resolution thumbnails.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it return everything | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | no video transcriptions or metadata counts“I like it, it got everything i needed from the channel, but i was expecting the transcription of the videos. Either way, i like the tool man.” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 1 praised · 1 complained | 2 | accurate extracted data and resultsvery low resolution thumbnails“I got accurate results. I recommend it to everyone!” — 5/5 |
| Does the publisher answer | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | unresponsive or stopped customer support“Video thumbnails are very low resolution and blocky looking. Found a bug in search results and opened a ticket but they stopped responding.” — 3/5 |
| What it supports | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | poor handling of channel-level content“not good for channels” — 3/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | no title or keyword filtering“It would be great to add a filter by title or keyword within the title. This would allow extracting videos based on specific titles or keywords.” — 3/5 |
| How fast | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | fast scraping and quick to use“I like how fast it grabs info from channels” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | simple to use and implement“What a fantastic tool! So simple and easy. Maximum ease of use. Love this” — 5/5 |
| Does it run | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | reliable with Make.com integrations“Does what it says. Works like a charm with make.com integrations.” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
1 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 2accurate extracted data and resultsvery low resolution thumbnails“I got accurate results. I recommend it to everyone!” — 5/5
Does the publisher answer
0 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 1unresponsive or stopped customer support“Video thumbnails are very low resolution and blocky looking. Found a bug in search results and opened a ticket but they stopped responding.” — 3/5
What it supports
0 ↑ · 1 ↓ of 1poor handling of channel-level content“not good for channels” — 3/5
Every count is a review we read.
11 of the 22 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 22 →
History
30 readings since 2026-08-27Alternatives on YouTube
The actors either side of #3 of 1,669, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
Sort
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 10,713126.3K total | 99.1% | 4.8 | 3.2y | fresh | ||
| 2 | B | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 3,26963.8K total | 99.6% | 4.4 | 3.6y | fresh | ||
| 3 | A | RES$1.30 /1kgood price | 2,56823.0K total | 99.6% | 4.6 | 3.2y | fresh | This | |
| 4 | C | RES$10.00 /1ksteep price | 2,31724.9K total | 86.6% | 3.7 | 22m | fresh | ||
| 5 | B | RES$5.00 /1khigh price | 2,30311.2K total | 99.7% | 5.0 | 13m | stale | ||
| 6 | A | RES$2.00 /1kgood price | 2,15724.0K total | 98.6% | 4.9 | 3.2y | fresh | ||
| 7 | B | EVT$0.01 /1k videoprocessed | 1,8633,725 total | 98.7% | 4.5 | 10m | fresh | ||
| 8 | B | EVT$6.00 /1k downloadMb | 1,03121.7K total | 97.9% | 4.3 | 20m | fresh |
pintostudio
starvibe
johnvc