Tweet Scraper|$0.18/1K Tweets | Pay-Per Result | No Rate Limits

Only $0.18/1000 tweets for Twitter scraping, 100% reliability, swift data retrieval.This incredible low price is almost too good to be true.Thanks to our large-scale operations and efficient servers, we can offer you rock-bottom prices that no competitors can match.

Publisher description, verbatim Deep comparison · 2026-09-09 Best Twitter (X) scrapers on Apify, tested — This actor is one of the six we tested.
Last 7 dayson this actor
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Price / 1k$0.25per 1,000 results
Users / 30d4,448↑ 399 over 30 readings
Users, all time27,113↑ 5,004 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d2.6m↑ 149,242 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo591runs per monthly user
Standing
#2of 808

on X (Twitter), by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.

Store search presence
18top-10 keywords

best #1 for “rate”

  • rate#1
  • rate limit#1
  • rate limits#1
  • 15 more#2–#9
re-crawled daily
Recorded changes
  • 2026-09-09reviewsNew reviews+1 (84 total)+184 total
showing 1 of 1 in the last 30 days · followers get the next one by email

What the reviews say

Cheap, fast, and generally accurate with responsive support, but it suffers from unreliable filtering/retrieval, inconsistent inputs and limits, and unexpected charges.

37 of 37 reviews carry text
ThemeSentimentSaidWhat they mean
What it costs7 praised · 6 complained13very low price and free creditsunexpected charges even with no results“5 stars kaching goes skrrrtttt then we're done yeah very nice scraper, one of the cheapest i can recommend and actually does not scrape duplicates for me.” — 5/5
Does it run0 praised · 6 complained6fails to retrieve paid-for resultsfiltering behavior is inconsistent and unclear“Yeni başladım. Çözmeye çalışıyorum. Şu an da N8n ile kullanıyorum. Tweet çekmede zorlanıyorum ama bgaşaracak gibiyim” — 5/5
Is the data right3 praised · 4 complained7delivers clean, duplicate-free datareturns mock or developer messages“Charges you and sends 15 results back even if no tweets found. At least don't just spam mock tweets in my results, what a joke.” — 1/5
Setup and docs1 praised · 3 complained4inputs behave inconsistently and hidden params appeardocumentation is incomplete or sparse“Fast, affordable, and powerful filters — but documentation is incomplete and some reliability/details feel unclear.” — 3/5
Caps and ceilings1 praised · 2 complained3maxItems limit applies per search termcannot perform multiple searches in one run“Amazing tool, would be much better if we could made multiple searches in 1 run tho 🚀” — 5/5
Does it return everything1 praised · 2 complained3searched keywords missing from outputfilters fail to apply to results“Can you please add the searched keyword in the output? I need to separate the results of each multiple keywords searches thank you!” — 5/5
What it supports0 praised · 1 complained1“it works very well, though except for realDonaldTrump account for some reason :( Could you please fix it?” — 4/5
How fast3 praised · 0 complained3fast response and high throughput“fast, generous and accurate” — 5/5
Does the publisher answer2 praised · 0 complained2responsive, helpful author support“Responsive author. Minor issues were quickly fixed” — 5/5

What it costs

7 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 13
very low price and free creditsunexpected charges even with no results“5 stars kaching goes skrrrtttt then we're done yeah very nice scraper, one of the cheapest i can recommend and actually does not scrape duplicates for me.” — 5/5

Does it run

0 ↑ · 6 ↓ of 6
fails to retrieve paid-for resultsfiltering behavior is inconsistent and unclear“Yeni başladım. Çözmeye çalışıyorum. Şu an da N8n ile kullanıyorum. Tweet çekmede zorlanıyorum ama bgaşaracak gibiyim” — 5/5

Is the data right

3 ↑ · 4 ↓ of 7
delivers clean, duplicate-free datareturns mock or developer messages“Charges you and sends 15 results back even if no tweets found. At least don't just spam mock tweets in my results, what a joke.” — 1/5

Setup and docs

1 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 4
inputs behave inconsistently and hidden params appeardocumentation is incomplete or sparse“Fast, affordable, and powerful filters — but documentation is incomplete and some reliability/details feel unclear.” — 3/5
5 more themes · read all 37 →
Every count is a review we read. 13 of the 37 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above. Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 37 →

History

30 readings since 2026-08-27
Users / 30d30 readings
08-27↑ 39909-25
Users, all time30 readings
08-27↑ 5,00409-25
Runs / 30d30 readings
08-27↑ 149,24209-25
Standing30 readings
08-27→ 009-25

Alternatives on X (Twitter)

The actors either side of #2 of 808, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.

all 808 on X (Twitter) →
Sort
#ActorGradePrice / 1kUsers /30dSuccessRatingAgeFresh
1BRES$0.40 /1k7,901101.8K total98.0%3.9 (196)2.8yfresh
2BRES$0.25 /1k4,44827.1K total99.4%4.3 (84)23mfreshThis
3AEVT$0.40 /1k dataset-item-tier-2,11734.1K total99.9%4.8 (101)2.4yfresh
4BRES$0.15 /1k1,3324,434 total99.8%4.5 (14)6mfresh
5BEVT$0.40 /1k dataset-item1,0209,026 total98.6%4.4 (16)2.8yfresh
6BRES$0.30 /1k5657,962 total100.0%4.4 (20)2.5yfresh
7BEVT$0.40 /1k result-item4952,922 total99.9%4.3 (8)15mfresh

Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get every overnight change in one morning report.

Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is yours free, forever.

Open in the app Claim this page

Numbers on this page are measured only by an independent census of the Apify Store — not self-reported.