What the reviews say
Produces clean, accurate, reliable, and easily exportable data with broad field coverage, but it becomes slow on larger runs.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| How fast | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | Slow on larger runs“Tested it on a target account - the extraction rate was over 50%, which honestly surprised me. Most tools overpromise on this. The fact that it also grabs phone numbers and websites when available is a nice bonus. I will say, larger runs take a while, but the results are worth the wait.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | Clean, well-structured exportable outputDirect Google Sheets integration“Gave it a shot on a small run. The emails it pulled were legit business contacts, not scraped-from-nowhere garbage. You can tell it's actually visiting each profile and pulling from bios and contact buttons. Integrated the results with Google Sheets and it was seamless.” — 5/5 |
| Does it run | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | Consistently reliable, straightforward behaviorSaves partial results for long runs“Straightforward and reliable. I use it to find potential partners in our niche by scraping followers of adjacent brands. The website and category fields help me quickly figure out who's worth reaching out to.” — 5/5 |
| What it supports | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | Extracts contact details and profile fieldsCaptures usernames, follower counts, categories“Used this for influencer outreach for a skincare brand I manage. Targeted a few accounts and pulled creator contact emails that would've taken me hours to collect manually. The output is clean and well-structured - username, email, follower count, category - everything I need to prioritize who to reach out to first.” — 5/5 |
| Is the data right | 3 praised · 0 complained | 3 | Highly accurate email extraction“Grabbed decent number of emails from followers of an account. That's a better rate than most scraping tools I've tried. Data quality was solid too - these are emails people voluntarily put on their profiles, so deliverability has been good.” — 5/5 |
| Does it return everything | 2 praised · 0 complained | 2 | Extraction rate consistently over fifty percent |
Setup and docs
3 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 3Does it run
3 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 3What it supports
3 ↑ · 0 ↓ of 3History
30 readings since 2026-08-27Alternatives on Instagram
The actors either side of #391 of 1,425, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 386 | B | EVT$0.50 /1k ad-result | 1113 total | 98.5% | 5.0 | 24d | fresh | ||
| 387 | B | RES$1.10 /1kgood price | 1159 total | 100.0% | — | 4m | fresh | ||
| 388 | — | RES$5.00 /1khigh price | 11272 total | — | — | 9m | stale | ||
| 389 | — | RES$10.00 /1khigh price | 1147 total | — | 5.0 | 4m | fresh | ||
| 390 | B | EVT$2.50 /1k comment-scraped | 1163 total | 100.0% | — | 3m | fresh | ||
| 391 | D | RES$28.00 /1ksteep price | 11195 total | — | 5.0 | 8m | fresh | This | |
| 392 | C | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 11187 total | 98.7% | 5.0 | 11m | aging | ||
| 393 | C | RES$3.00 /1kgood price | 11705 total | 99.6% | 1.8 | 20m | aging | ||
| 394 | C | RES$3.00 /1kgood price | 11753 total | 100.0% | 2.0 | 20m | aging | ||
| 395 | — | EVT$2.00 /1k topic | 1127 total | — | — | 59d | fresh | ||
| 396 | C | RES$4.00 /1kfair price | 1148 total | 87.9% | 4.5 | 11m | fresh |