✨Leads Finder - $1.5/1k leads with Emails [Apollo Alternative]

✅ Affordable alternative to ZoomInfo, Lusha & Apollo. ✅ Get Business email, 📞Mobile Number, Personal email, LinkedIn profiles, company details etc..

Publisher description, verbatim
Last 7 dayson this actor
  • 2rank moves
  • 1other change
  • 50new rivals on LinkedIn
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures27 readings
Price / 1k$2.00per 1,000 lead-fetched
Users / 30d2,190↓ 583 over 27 readings
Users, all time47,690↑ 1,812 over 27 readings
Runs / 30d141.7k↓ 13,571 over 27 readings
Runs / user / mo64.7runs per monthly user
Standing
#14of 1,383

on LinkedIn, by users in the last 30 days among actors classified to this platform.

Store search presence
13top-10 keywords

best #1 for “alternative”

  • alternative#1
  • apollo#1
  • apollo alternative#1
  • 10 more#2–#3
re-crawled daily
Recorded changes
  • 2026-09-24searchKeyword rank moveleft top-10 for “free keyword” (#10 → #11)—on record
  • 2026-09-23reviewsNew reviews+1 (549 total)+1549 total
  • 2026-09-22searchKeyword rank moveleft top-10 for “notes users” (#10 → #11)—on record
showing 3 of 43 in the last 30 days · followers get all 43 by email

What the reviews say

Fast, affordable, and easy-to-use scraper that often returns accurate, rich contact data — but it fails unpredictably (timeouts/zero results), suffers from missing or duplicate fields, coverage mismatches, and billing/support problems.

283 of 283 reviews carry text
ThemeSentimentSaidWhat they mean
Does it run10 praised · 41 complained51consistently returns reliable resultsoften fails, times out, or returns nothing“Does not work. Looks like the creator has just added some random data in the db and is fetching results from there without considering the filters given by the user. I'd be happy to see this work and I had high hopes but I've been let down.” — 1/5
Is the data right16 praised · 24 complained40delivers relevant, accurate contacts and leadsmany invalid, outdated, or irrelevant emails“Actually, the quality seems good at first but when I thoroughly look into each data, many of the fields are missing and even I selected Email verified option, there are more than 60 percent of email missing leads. Totally useless.” — 1/5
Does it return everything2 praised · 22 complained24includes many useful contact fieldshigh rate of duplicate or missing contacts“I have uploaded 1800+ companies to extract email data for specific titles out of which i got only 670 email from the uploaded companies to your platform and others pulled random companies i never included and changed me $4 it says $1.5/1k leads also last refund not received yet.” — 1/5
What it costs12 praised · 14 complained26very affordable and good valuecharged incorrectly and billed for failed runs“Ran a campaign of about 20k prospects, and I do notice that there's a increase level prospects that are no longer working or retired. The database seems to be outdated and not refreshed as often. Though it's much cheaper, not sure if it's worth the price versus accuracy.” — 1/5
Caps and ceilings0 praised · 12 complained12limited to a small number of leads per run“As a fellow competitor I must say the speed is unmatched, I would only like to see a estimate on leads count to be fetched before the run in future updates. One of the best, keep it up.” — 5/5
What it supports5 praised · 11 complained16fetches emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn datareturns wrong countries or unrelated companies“It work but all the companies are located in US and the phone number too , even if we exclude United states , the result is still the same , the majority in US” — 1/5
Does the publisher answer3 praised · 5 complained8responsive developer support and fast fixesunresponsive owner and delayed refunds“Terrible data, and the maker is too busy to answer any message the clown. people getting billed for this bullshit outdated list, and the filters sometimes dont even work, and the clown doesnt even fix it. Lame, only about 10-20% of the leads are valid, over 70% are guaranteed garbage, either invalid, or unrelated to the filters you add. I hope apify just issue some kind of penalty to guys like this.” — 1/5
Setup and docs13 praised · 2 complained15easy to use with simple filterslimited documentation and some learning curve“We used this actor to build multiple campaigns across different niches. Filters work well, and the data is reliable enough to plug straight into our outreach. Thanks for the tool.” — 5/5
How fast11 praised · 0 complained11lightning-fast, delivers first results within minutes“It looks quite promising. I ran a few searches and found good leads. Quite flexible and efficient. I am still testing it but so far I like the output. Results seem to be little less than I expected, but I am still tweaking and finding my way around this scraper. Looking forward to further improvements.” — 4/5

Does it run

10 ↑ · 41 ↓ of 51
consistently returns reliable resultsoften fails, times out, or returns nothing“Does not work. Looks like the creator has just added some random data in the db and is fetching results from there without considering the filters given by the user. I'd be happy to see this work and I had high hopes but I've been let down.” — 1/5

Is the data right

16 ↑ · 24 ↓ of 40
delivers relevant, accurate contacts and leadsmany invalid, outdated, or irrelevant emails“Actually, the quality seems good at first but when I thoroughly look into each data, many of the fields are missing and even I selected Email verified option, there are more than 60 percent of email missing leads. Totally useless.” — 1/5

Does it return everything

2 ↑ · 22 ↓ of 24
includes many useful contact fieldshigh rate of duplicate or missing contacts“I have uploaded 1800+ companies to extract email data for specific titles out of which i got only 670 email from the uploaded companies to your platform and others pulled random companies i never included and changed me $4 it says $1.5/1k leads also last refund not received yet.” — 1/5

What it costs

12 ↑ · 14 ↓ of 26
very affordable and good valuecharged incorrectly and billed for failed runs“Ran a campaign of about 20k prospects, and I do notice that there's a increase level prospects that are no longer working or retired. The database seems to be outdated and not refreshed as often. Though it's much cheaper, not sure if it's worth the price versus accuracy.” — 1/5
5 more themes · read all 283 →
Every count is a review we read. 141 of the 283 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific — those are excluded from the themes above. Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 283 →

History

27 readings since 2026-08-27
Users / 30d27 readings
08-27↓ 58309-25
Users, all time27 readings
08-27↑ 1,81209-25
Runs / 30d27 readings
08-27↓ 13,57109-25
Standing30 readings
08-27↑ 109-25

Alternatives on LinkedIn

The actors either side of #14 of 1,383, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.

all 1,383 on LinkedIn →
Sort
#ActorGradePrice / 1kUsers /30dSuccessRatingAgeFresh
9BRES$0.70 /1kgood price4,14249.9K total97.5%4.1 (41)20maging
10BRES$5.00 /1kfair price3,73519.4K total99.8%4.7 (64)22maging
11AEVT$2.00 /1k postgood price3,52012.1K total100.0%5.0 (21)15mfresh
12BRES$5.00 /1kfair price2,50222.9K total98.8%4.8 (66)21maging
13BRES$1.50 /1kgood price2,42039.0K total99.1%4.3 (72)3.6yfresh
14CEVT$2.00 /1k lead-fetchedgood price2,19047.7K total98.6%3.5 (549)12mfreshThis
15CRES$5.00 /1kfair price1,82314.9K total99.9%2.9 (20)15mfresh
16AEVT$2.00 /1k post-commentgood price1,7197,806 total100.0%4.8 (22)16mfresh
17BEVT$2.00 /1k short-companygood price1,6467,913 total100.0%4.4 (22)10mfresh
18BEVT$4.00 /1k search-pagesteep price1,6027,851 total87.0%4.5 (17)14mfresh
19BEVT$2.00 /1k postgood price1,46516.5K total99.7%4.1 (54)19mfresh

Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get every overnight change in one morning report.

Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is yours free, forever.

Open in the app Claim this page

Numbers on this page are measured only by an independent census of the Apify Store — not self-reported.