What the reviews say
Fast and often accurate at finding company employees, but frequently fails to run or filter correctly, is expensive, limited in results, and has poor support.
| Theme | Sentiment | Said | What they mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does it run | 0 praised · 8 complained | 8 | frequently fails to run or executereturns random or unusable results“rien ne fonctionne les adresses linkedin pourtant existantes, sont refusées” — 1/5 |
| Is the data right | 2 praised · 3 complained | 5 | accurate at finding company employeesreturns people from wrong companies“I'm searching a LinkedIn page and receive 20 people from different companies. What's up ??” — 1/5 |
| What it costs | 0 praised · 3 complained | 3 | extremely expensive; users request refunds“I should get a refund it didn't even work” — 1/5 |
| Caps and ceilings | 0 praised · 2 complained | 2 | limited to ten results per companyaccepts only one company per run“For finding company employee you need these settings: 1- Full url (Ex: with the trailing / at the end and the www. 2- You use only 1 company per run. 3- You use the Residential Proxy. With that, I get very good result. You can spin a script in python to multithread multiple run and process your result easily.” — 5/5 |
| Setup and docs | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | requires exact full URL with trailing slash |
| Does the publisher answer | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | no customer support available“Doesnt work and no support” — 1/5 |
| What it supports | 0 praised · 1 complained | 1 | rejects LinkedIn addresses or URLs |
| How fast | 1 praised · 0 complained | 1 | fast performance with quick results“Actor is accurate and fast” — 5/5 |
Is the data right
2 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 5What it costs
0 ↑ · 3 ↓ of 3Caps and ceilings
0 ↑ · 2 ↓ of 2History
30 readings since 2026-08-27Alternatives on LinkedIn
The actors either side of #112 of 1,383, ranked by users in the last 30 days. Same platform, adjacent adoption — the comparable set.
| # | Actor | Grade | Price / 1k | Users /30d | Success | Rating | Age | Fresh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107 | B | EVT$8.00 /1k profile-scrapedgood price | 77579 total | 97.2% | — | 6m | fresh | ||
| 108 | C | EVT$25.00 /1k short-profilehigh price | 772,039 total | 63.3% | 1.0 | 7m | fresh | ||
| 109 | C | RES$1.55 /1kgood price | 76509 total | 100.0% | 4.8 | 12m | aging | ||
| 110 | B | RES$5.00 /1khigh price | 76201 total | 86.4% | 5.0 | 5m | fresh | ||
| 111 | C | EVT$3.00 /1k result-itemgood price | 761,192 total | 99.5% | 2.1 | 14m | aging | ||
| 112 | D | EVT$20.00 /1k data_requestfair price | 724,134 total | 95.5% | 1.0 | 2.7y | aging | This | |
| 113 | C | RES$2.99 /1kfair price | 72914 total | 99.3% | 5.0 | 2.1y | aging | ||
| 114 | B | RES$1.60 /1kfair price | 71265 total | 100.0% | 5.0 | 5m | fresh | ||
| 115 | C | EVT$50.00 /1k profile-foundsteep price | 70373 total | 99.8% | — | 4m | aging | ||
| 116 | D | RES$9.99 /1ksteep price | 703,958 total | 87.3% | 1.0 | 16m | aging | ||
| 117 | C | RES$1.50 /1kgood price | 69310 total | 99.6% | 5.0 | 3m | aging |