β Cheap alternative to Apollo, ZoomInfo & Lusha. β Get business emails, LinkedIn profiles, company details etc.. With verified email π§ and mobile number πβ
Publisher description, verbatim
Last 7 dayson this actor
1rank move
Each one reaches followers by email the morning after.Follow this actor
Key figures30 readings
Price / 1k$3.00per 1,000 leads
Users / 30d809↑ 133 over 30 readings
Users, all time21,159↑ 967 over 30 readings
Runs / 30d45k↑ 16,234 over 30 readings
Runs / user / mo55.7runs per monthly user
Store search presence
16top-10 keywords
best #1 for “contact finder”
contact finder#1
email finder#1
finder emails#1
13 more#2–#10
re-crawled daily
Recorded changes
2026-09-25searchKeyword rank moveentered top-10 for βemailsβ (#11 β #10)βon record
2026-09-17searchKeyword rank moveentered top-3 for βfinderβ (#4 β #2)βon record
2026-09-17searchKeyword rank moveentered top-3 for βfindβ (#5 β #3)βon record
showing 3 of 40 in the last 30 days · followers get all 40 by email
What the reviews say
Performs well at producing many leads and occasional high email yield, but fails due to frequent outages, incomplete or empty outputs, unexpected charges, strict limits, poor support/documentation, accuracy/verification gaps, and missing contact details.
84 of 84 reviews carry text
Theme
Sentiment
Said
What they mean
Does it run
0 praised · 20 complained
20
often doesn't work or times outgets charged despite failed runs“Returns nothing for me no matter the parameters. Went as far as to search just 3 industries inside the USA with no other restrictions, and it returned no results. works for 3 seconds, says "success!" as it returns zero data.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 praised · 16 complained
18
substantial email-retrieval improvement for some runsmany runs return few or no emails“Generally good but please add limit of employees per company (for example only 3 employees per company), because otherwise in some companies 20 employees can be found and in another β none, it makes results unusable” — 4/5
What it costs
3 praised · 15 complained
18
offers strong value at low pricecharged despite empty or failed runs“I reported this issue yesterday, and although it was marked as βfixed,β the problem is still happening β we continue to get charged $0.50 per test. It seems this has happened with other closed issues as well. Could you please ensure itβs properly resolved this time?” — 1/5
Does the publisher answer
0 praised · 5 complained
5
unresponsive developer or support channelsinsufficient or missing documentation“Shared issues with missing emails and bad title pull but haven't heard back from the development. This is costing money and time. Every pull has only 30% emails and then bad data mixed along. For example, if you pull IT titles, Healthcare people, Professors are getting pulled as well.” — 2/5
Caps and ceilings
2 praised · 4 complained
6
capable of scraping large volumes occasionallylimited to 100 leads or three employees“amazing thing scaper. only able to get 100 results.
Is there a way to get 1k results or more? I am on free account. LOL!” — 5/5
Is the data right
2 praised · 2 complained
4
accurate data in many casesincorrect job titles are pulled“I took a lead from here pasted it into apollo, found that he guy worked at company B here and company A in apollo, so i figured something was wrong....I went to his linkedin and guess what! this info was correct, while apollo was incorrect. Actually pretty cool” — 5/5
Setup and docs
0 praised · 2 complained
2
unclear usage instructions and examplesconfusing filter input, paste Apollo URL“Hola David gracias por el Actor, que posibilidad hay que pudieramos pegar el URL que tenemos de apollo para que ya tenga todos los filtros mas personalizados y la busqueda sea mas precisa ?” — 4/5
What it supports
3 praised · 1 complained
4
broad lead coverage with many emailsno phone numbers included with leads“I like that I can scrape a good amount of leads, but I would like to ask and I hope you will be honest with me. Does this Scraper Access LinkedIn Sales Nav leads? Are the leads in the scraping poll updated regularly?” — 5/5
Does it run
0 ↑ · 20 ↓ of 20
often doesn't work or times outgets charged despite failed runs“Returns nothing for me no matter the parameters. Went as far as to search just 3 industries inside the USA with no other restrictions, and it returned no results. works for 3 seconds, says "success!" as it returns zero data.” — 1/5
Does it return everything
2 ↑ · 16 ↓ of 18
substantial email-retrieval improvement for some runsmany runs return few or no emails“Generally good but please add limit of employees per company (for example only 3 employees per company), because otherwise in some companies 20 employees can be found and in another β none, it makes results unusable” — 4/5
What it costs
3 ↑ · 15 ↓ of 18
offers strong value at low pricecharged despite empty or failed runs“I reported this issue yesterday, and although it was marked as βfixed,β the problem is still happening β we continue to get charged $0.50 per test. It seems this has happened with other closed issues as well. Could you please ensure itβs properly resolved this time?” — 1/5
Does the publisher answer
0 ↑ · 5 ↓ of 5
unresponsive developer or support channelsinsufficient or missing documentation“Shared issues with missing emails and bad title pull but haven't heard back from the development. This is costing money and time. Every pull has only 30% emails and then bad data mixed along. For example, if you pull IT titles, Healthcare people, Professors are getting pulled as well.” — 2/5
Every count is a review we read.
31 of the 84 said only that they liked it, with nothing specific β those are excluded from the themes above.
Quotes are one reviewer, unedited.Read all 84 →
History
30 readings since 2026-08-27
Users / 30d30 readingsUsers, all time30 readingsRuns / 30d30 readings
Follow this actor, compare it against its rivals, and get
every overnight change in one morning report.
Publish it yourself? Claim your publisher page and its full history is
yours free, forever.